ABSTRACT
Objetivo: esse estudo avaliou o efeito de protocolos de irrigação final, associados ao uso de EDTA e QMix, na remoção de smear layer. Métodos: foram utilizados 40 dentes humanos com canal único. Os canais foram instrumentados com sistema ProTaper Universal SX-F3. As substâncias químicas utilizadas durante o preparo foram hipoclorito de sódio a 5,25% (NaOCl) ou clorexidina a 2% (CHX) gel. Terminado o preparo, os dentes foram divididos em oito grupos, de acordo com os irrigantes: G1) NaOCl 5,25% + EDTA 17% + NaOCl 5,25%; G2) NaOCl 5,25% + EDTA 17% + água destilada (AD); G3) NaOCl 5,25% + QMix + NaOCl 5,25%; G4) NaOCl 5,25% + QMix + AD; G5) CHX 2% gel + EDTA 17% + CHX 2% solução; G6) CHX 2% gel + EDTA 17% + AD; G7) CHX 2% gel + QMix + CHX 2% solução e G8) CHX 2% gel + QMix + AD. As amostras foram avaliadas por microscopia eletrônica de varredura ambiental, antes e após os protocolos de irrigação final. As imagens foram classificadas por escores, em relação à presença de smear layer, e os dados foram analisados pelos testes de Kruskal-Wallis e de Mann-Whitney. Resultados: o G1 mostrou os melhores resultados em relação à remoção de smear layer (p < 0,05). A CHX gel 2% mostrou menor formação de smear layer, quando comparada ao NaOCl, após o preparo biomecânico; e o NaOCl apresentou melhor limpeza como irrigante final (p < 0,05). Conclusões: o NaOCl como irrigante final, combinado ao EDTA, mostrou melhor capacidade de remoção da smear layer (AU).
Introduction: This study evaluated the effect of different final irrigation protocols using EDTA and QMix on smear layer removal. Methods: The root canals of 40 single-rooted human teeth were prepared with ProTaper Universal SX - F3. The substances used were 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), 2% chlorhexidine gel (chlorhexidine), 2% chlorhexidine solution and distilled water. The teeth were divided into 8 groups, according to the irrigant used: G1: 5.25% NaOCl + 17% EDTA + 5.25% NaOCl; G2: 5.25% NaOCl + 17% EDTA + distilled water; G3: 5.25% NaOCl + QMix + 5.25% NaOCl; G4: 5.25% NaOCl + QMix + DW; G5: 2% chlorhexidine gel + 17% EDTA + 2% chlorhexidine solution; G6: 2% chlorhexidine gel + 17% EDTA + distilled water; G7: 2% chlorhexidine gel + QMix + 2% chlorhexidine solution; and G8: 2% chlorhexidine gel + QMix + distilled water. Samples were evaluated under environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) before and after irrigation. ESEM images were classified according to smear layer scores, and the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used for statistical analyses. Results: Group 1 had the best results for smear layer removal (p<0.05). Smear layer formation was lower when 2% chlorhexidine gel was used after cleaning and shaping than when the irrigant was 5.25% NaOCl, and 5.25% NaOCl had the best cleaning ability as a final irrigant. Conclusion: 5.25% NaOCl combined with EDTA was the best final irrigant for smear layer removal (AU).
Subject(s)
Root Canal Irrigants , Sodium Hypochlorite , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Smear LayerABSTRACT
The present study aimed to assess the prevalence of apical periodontitis (AP) in an urban Brazilian population according to gender, age group and tooth type. Data were collected from clinical files containing the medical and dental histories and periapical radiographs of 1,126 patients treated at the School of Dentistry at Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro between March 2000 and December 2010. A total of 15,724 periapical radiographs were evaluated. All the radiographs were evaluated by two independent, previously calibrated endodontists (kappa = 0.88). Periapical areas on the radiographs were classified as N (normal) or AR (apical radiolucency). The frequency of AP and the 95% Confidence Interval (95%CI) were calculated according to gender, age group and tooth type. Differences between groups were calculated using the Z-test at a significance level of 5% (p < 0.05). AP was present in 7.87% of the samples, with 16.70% occurring on previously endodontically treated teeth and 44.65% occurring on teeth referred for endodontic treatment (TR-RCT). The frequency of AP was higher among females (64%) than among males (35%). The central and lateral maxillary incisors were the most frequently affected teeth. The frequency of AP was higher among individuals between 30 and 49 years of age. In this population, AP was more prevalent among females and among individuals between 30 and 49 years of age, and the central and lateral maxillary incisors were the most frequently affected teeth.